The US government can use 18th -century law to deport migrants, says a top court


The Supreme Court of the United States Monday allowed Trump’s administration to use the 18th -century war law to deport the Venezuelan migrants, but said they had to get a debate on court before being taken from the United States.

In a bitterly divided decision, the court said that the administration must give the Venezuelan, which he claims to be members of the gang “Reasonable Time” to go to court.

But the conservative majority said that legal challenges must happen in Texas instead of in the Washington courtroom.

In disagreement, three liberal judges said the administration sought to avoid a court audit in this case, and the court “now rewarding the Government for his behavior.” Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the disposal parts.

Justices acted on an emergency appeal of the administration after the Federal Court of Appeal in Washington left the order temporarily prohibiting the deportation of migrants accused that members of the gang under the Law on Rarely Used Enemary Enemies (AEA).

“For all the rhetoric of disagreement,” the court wrote in an unprepared opinion, the High Court’s command confirms “that the detainees are subject to the removal orders in accordance with AEA have the right to notice the opportunity to dispute their removal.”

Escalating tension

The case became a flash in the midst of escalation of tension between the White House and the Federal Courts.

US Attorney General Pam Bonda called the judgment of the court “a significant victory for the rule of law.”

“A activist judge in Washington, DC does not have the jurisdiction to take control of the authority of Trump President for external policy and keeps the US people,” Bondi wrote in a post on social media.

AND Original order Banking deportations in El Salvador was issued by US District Judge James E. Boasberg, the Chief Judge of the Washington Federal Court.

US President Donald Trump called on the Law on Aliens Enemies for the first time after World War II to justify the deportation of hundreds of people under the presidential proclamation that the Band of De Aragua called an invasive force.

Attorneys from the US Union for civil freedom filed a lawsuit on behalf of the five Venezuelan Noncitizans who held themselves in Texas, hours after the proclamation was published, and as the immigration authorities were loans to hundreds of migrants in waiting on the planes they were waiting.

Boasberg has imposed a temporary stop of deportation, and also ordered the Venezuelan immigrants to return to the US that did not happen. The judge held a hearing last week about whether the government defied his command to reverse planes. The administration called for the “privilege of state secrets” and refused to give Boasberg additional information on deportations.

Trump and his allies invited the Imperative Boasberg. IN A rare statementChief Judge John Roberts said that “the imperrand is not an appropriate response to a disagreement regarding a court decision.”



Source link

  • Related Posts

    World leaders react to Pope Francis’ death

    Pope Francis greets people on March 8, 2023 at St. Peter’s Square in the Vatican. Guglielmo Mangiaipane | Reuters After the respect and condolences around the world The death of…

    For some time the journalist who covered him, Francis was always a surprise

    An incredible choice for the Pope to advocate the causes and cause Orthodoxy, holding allies and critics equally on their feet. Source link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *