
Freight Essentials is receding against WWEX group efforts to keep writing in the third modified petition in Freight Essentials’ Demand against WWEX.
WWEX and his affiliates, Worldwide Express, GlobalTranz and Unishippers, presented to movement December 17 to keep the writing and seal the non -awake version.
The defendants argue that certain details of the demand contain sensitive business information that, if they are disseminated, could harm their competitive position, but the operation of goods, a logistics company, says that the industry could think otherwise.
“GlobalTranz, Worldwide Express and WWEX exploded consumers and partners, achieving millions of poor gains. In a blatant attempt to prevent public scrutiny, they want to keep the key details of their dishonest business activities. , he said in a news release Thursday.
This motion follows the federal demand of Freight Essentials, filed in the Northern District of Texas, accusing the WWEX group and its affiliates of a hidden rate regime that involves fuel costs and load insurance.
Demand claims that GlobalTranz represented transport costs, depriving business development companies of their legitimate commission payments, while allegedly inflating the WWEX Fund line with unpayed rates.
In addition, Freight Essentials claims that it was retaliated to discover the regime when the contract was terminated without proper notice.
The last legal removal of the WWEX group focuses on the rule of the Civil Procedure 76a of Texas, which allows the court to seal the judicial records if a party can prove that the outreach would cause serious damage and that there is no alternative method to protect information .
The motion quotes more than 20 paragraphs and multiple page notes of the third modified request that supposedly contain commercial secrets and commercial sensitive data, including business plans, consulting growth strategies, key collaborations, income and margin data, details, details of the GlobalTranz Package program and the presumed privileged lawyer -in decent communications.
The defendants argue that keeping these details under a stamp does not hurt the public interest, as the basic complaints of the essential complaint of goods remain available in the non -awakening portions of the demand.
If the court grants its application, the non -awake version of the request will remain sealed. If you refuse, the public could deepen the internal trade relations of WWEX and the particularities of the presumed hidden rate regime.