It is clear who sees Tariff as a political winner in Washington. It’s not Trump’s side


Some of Donald Trump’s friends in Washington suddenly sound nervous about having the keys to the economy. A few even talk about how to drive them away.

There are several initial efforts to alleviate the legal power of the US president to set up tariffs, which are now used in an unprecedented way.

These efforts are long. What is most significant is not whether it will happen, at least not yet. What is most significant is what they discover.

And what they discover is the nervousness among Trump’s allies – on Capitol Hill, which was obviously stunned by the scope of his tariffs, such as Wall Street.

Take Ted Cruza. The Texas Senator says it is okay if Trump is doing this as a negotiating plan. But he is worried that Trump could actually take the tariffs seriously in place forever.

If these crafts on the Allies remain 30 days, 60 days, 90 days – they are still damaging the economy – it is a terrible outcome, Cruz says. And he fears that it might actually be a plan.

Watch | Trump’s mathematics does not add up:

Bizarre way in which Trump’s team calculated reciprocal tariffs

The White House has published a formula used to calculate Trump’s tariff ‘Release Day’. Andrew Chang explains why the math is not adding up. Then, Trump says that he is ‘not joking’ about the potentially nominated for the third term of office – can he do so?

He was surprisingly expressed by the prediction of what it would mean in the middle of the year next year if the tariffs cause a recession.

“In all likelihood, politically, it would be bloodshed,” Cruz said on Friday in his subcastation. “You would face a democratic house, and you might even face the Senate of Democrats.”

Wall Street did not expect Trump to follow, Cruz said, a point underlined due to the fall 10 percent in the S&P 500 index this week.

The Republican also pushed the idea that these tariffs would only harm strangers or foreign companies. He said that a large American car company told him that he expects to increase the average vehicle price by $ 4,500 by this summer.

According to his condition, it is not clear what Trump’s goal is. The White House sends mixed messages.

On the one hand, the official line is that these tariffs are generally permanent and will help collect tax revenues. Still, Trump also talks about negotiations with Canada. On Friday, he suggested that he could do this to Vietnam, after offered to eliminate his tariffs.

Watch | Markets are constantly falling:

Markets suffer the largest losses of 2020 in the middle of mixed tariff messages from the White House

Stoke around the world fell the second day after the announced world tariffs of US President Donald Trump, and the White House officials offered conflicting needs whether tariffs were a negotiating tactic.

Cruz is not alone in his concern.

Several Republicans told CNN to hope for evidence – quickly – that this is just a negotiating board.

Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson said, “I will currently benefit (Trump) with a doubt, but I’m worried.”

One of them, Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, who faces a difficult struggle for a re -choice, said that farmers in his country are one of the bank crops: “They don’t have time.”

Children’s Steps in Congress

So what do these senators do about it?

After all, the US Constitution gives the congress authority over tariffs. But since World War II, it has been allowed the president to impose them in an emergency.

Now, numerous legislators talk about setting ups. The effort mainly leads Democrats, but there is evidence that some Republicans want to help.

The man in the suit speaks as he sits in front of the microphone.
Senator Ted Cruz participates in a hearing to confirm the director of FBI KASHA PATELA in Washington, January 30th. (Ben Curtis/Associated Press)

It all started with four who voted for the recall of Trump’s tariffs in Canada; that The measure this week adopted the Senatebut it seems convicted in the house.

In the home, however, she strives to force the vote of the measure. Democrats started a complicated procedure to push the problem on the floor.

In addition, a Republican with the longest service in Senate, the third in accordance with the presidential succession, sponsors his own proposal of the law. Chuck Grassley’s measure He would require Congress Tariff’s approval or would expire for 60 days.

Again, it is worth noting that these measures are mildly, long. Even if, by some political miracle, they went through both congress chambers, it is almost unthinkable to get enough votes to endure Trump’s veto.

This is the context that speaks.

Democrats smell of a political winner

There was no doubt that the party, on Friday afternoon, believed it had an advantage on the matter. Democrats are now hungry to talk to tariffs.

They are desperately decaying from last year’s choices to a message to focus on, now that they are in opposition.

The main figures of the party held their second press conference on Capitol Hill on Friday, announcing the efforts to resolve the antitarif measures at the proposal of the Budget Act operating through the Senate.

Talking about Trump’s tariffs, the top Democrat of Senate Chuck Schumer said that: “They are one of the dumbest decisions he has ever made as president – and that says a lot.”

By promoting the line of his party, Schumer described Tariff as a class issue: de facto of a middle class, in order to generate revenues used to reduce taxes on billionaires.

“That’s a shame,” he said.

Senator Ben Ray Luján of Novi Mexico said Republicans never talk about economic responsibility again. “Because he’ll throw him through the door,” he said.

And on the day when the stock market melted, and relations in the US were in shame, and the world spoke about retaliation, here’s another sign.

The story barely rated mentioning anywhere on the Fox News website on Friday afternoon, and only occasionally appeared on her TV net. It was not difficult to say who considered this issue a political winner on Friday. And who is not.



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Seat elimination of family guips flying passengers entering baby’s changing position

    An airline traveler said he or she recently encountered a seat exchanger on the plane and claimed that a family was “injured” to the person. In the “R/Delta” forum on…

    A new pact requires ships to reduce emissions or pay fees

    In the midst of the unrest because of the global trade, countries around the world have reached an extraordinary, although a modest agreement on Friday to reduce the pollution of…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *