Meta no longer has any truths of US truth to arrive Monday, according to The Chief Global Affairs officially Joel Kaplan.

Meta announced this important change in January policy when it also broke the rules of its moderate content.

The time of this revision includes President Trump’s inauguration, viewed by Meta Counder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg after Donate $ 1 million in Trump’s inauguration funds. At the same time, Zuckerberg added Dana White, a long trump amly and CEO of the UFC, on the Meta board.

“The new election as well as a cultural tipping point toward once before talking,” says Zuckerberg in a present Notification of moderation changes.

However some of the languages ​​that Zuckerberg is the intention of prioritizing the spending of marginalized people.

“We allow allegations of mental illness or abnormality if based on gender or sexual orientation and religious discourse about transgerdism and homosexuality,” meta’s Delosfufle Pation Pation read.

META is to model new investigative efforts after the Xnounces community notes, which puts other users’ moders than professions.

“In the area of ​​truth checks, the first community notes start slowly across Facebook, Threads & Instagram, with no penalties included,” Kaplan wrote to X.

While this community-based method of moderate content can sometimes provide essential context to mislead or controversial posts, what is going to overtake the rough content.

The best money in meta is the attention of its users, and the less-gracious content means that there are many posts for people to see – more, the feed of people with a strong reaction.

That, as Meta began to repeat the programs to investigate its truth, Incorrect content began to spread. A Facebook Page Manager, spreading Viral, fake claim that the ice will pay people $ 750 to point it about those who have not yet been immigrated, told the propublica that the end of the factual investigation program is “Great Information.”

“We take several restrictions on subjects such as immigration, gender recognition and gender that is always political and debate discourse,” Kaplan WRITES in January. “It’s not right that things can be said on TV or Congress floor, but not on our platforms.”