Singapore’s anti -scanning method has triggered debate on parent -style governance | Criminal


Singapore – Last year, Charlotte Goh received a call claimed to be officials in the Singapore Cyber ​​Security Bureau.

The callor told GOH that her phone number was related to the Malaysian scam and brought her to the “Malaysian Interpol Organization” to submit a report.

As a sales expert, he often lists his own phone number in public places. Goh requires the use of a pseudonym and finds that this story is reasonable.

In two hours, GOH shared her personal details, such as her name and identification number, although she hesitated to disclose her exact bank details.

She told the Peninsula TV: “I’m not sure if this is a scam-it sounds so real-but I am also worried that it may be.”

When she was asked to take a picture with an official ID, Goh realized that she was deceived and hung up. Fortunately, GOH, a 58 -year -old, can quickly change the password and transfer funds to his daughter’s account before being stolen.

Other people in her circle of friends are not so lucky.

She said: “Some friends have lost thousands of people.”

Singapore is one of the richest and proficient Internet in the world, and has become the main goal of global scammers.

In the global anti -company annual report in 2023, Singapore’s average loss was the highest. Among all the countries surveyed, the average loss of all victims was $ 4,031.

In the first half of 2024, reports on scams reached a record of 26,587, with a loss of $ 284 million.

To solve this problem, the government has turned to unprecedented measures.

Earlier this month, the Singapore Parliament passed the first legislation to award the authorities of the authorities to freeze the suspicious victim of the bank account.

Under the protection of the scam bill, the designated officials can order the bank. If individuals have reason to believe that they intend to transfer funds, withdraw money or use credit facilities to benefit scammers, they can prevent their transactions.

Affected people still retain funds that get daily costs.

Singapore police said persuading victims to be deceived is a continuous challenge.

Although there are many anti -scanning plans, education work and banks introduce functions such as killing switches, 86 % of the scams reported by all reports from January 2024 to September 2024 are involved in the willingness to transfer funds. Essence

The common strategies used by scammers include the fantasy of impersonating government officials and establishing a romantic relationship.

“The bill allows the police to take decisive actions, and the gap between our Arsenal against scammers,” Xueling, the Minister of Internal Affairs and Social and Family Development, told the parliament.

Although the law is called the key tool of fighting the RAMP scam by its supporters, it also aroused debate on the tendency of the Singaporean government to intervene in private affairs. “” “.

Critics regard the law as an extension of parental governance embodied by Singapore’s founder Lee Kuan Yew is the lateHe once announced that he was “proud” for the city country called the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State of the State, and claimed that through intervention in personal affairs, such as “who your neighbors are, your life, your noise, how do you vomit water.”

LKY
Former Singapore Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew gave a speech at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum in St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, Russia on June 10, 2007 (Alexander Demian Chuk/Reuters)

Hamus Lim, a member of the Congress of the Little Organization Party, replaced the account.

Lin said: “How to make law enforcement departments have a large amount of latitude to intervene and limit it is eventually a large amount of latitude of private transactions, which may be uncomfortable.”

Bertha Henson, a former editor of the Straits Times newspaper, said that the legislation is only the latest example of the government’s intervention in “Many places in our lives”.

“Can we be an adult, instead of continuing to go to the state to seek protection?” Hesson said in Facebook’s post. “Because we should really think further and ask anyone who will protect individuals from being exempted from the country’s infringement. Or, can we always ensure that the right hand is in charge.”

The discussion was carried out in the circumstances that the government took a scope of measures to strengthen public safety, including the planned amendments to the number of police surveillance cameras to more than 200,000 from the mid -2030s to the 1930s to the 1930s to the 1930s to the 1930s. Individuals who have mental health are considered safety risks.

Other recent laws, such as the protection of online false and manipulation bills and manipulation laws, and the “Foreign Intervention Law” (countermeasures), reflect the efforts to solve error information and external impact.

Although it will be used as a measure to protect national security and social stability, they also give the authorities the extensive rights of the authorities.

Walter Thereira, associate professor of economics at the University of Social Sciences (SUSS), said the government’s anti -scanning legislation reflects the steep economic and social costs of urban countries.

Thusira pointed out that many retirees choose to manage a lot of funds outside Singapore’s compulsory savings plans to fund retirement, healthcare and housing demand, so that they “have lost all these risks.”

“Unfortunately, if your decision eventually relies on society or encourages more criminal activities, then the right to use funds to do what you want to do may be limited.”

Eugene Tan, an associate professor at the Singapore University of Management (SMU) Law School, said the increasing losses of scams have prompted people to change towards the “method of pre -making people” in order to prevent scams before the occurrence.

Tan told the Peninsula TV: “If you do not do more, then we are not out of reach from the disaster.”

“The government is still living in social costs, which will be the duty of the upcoming crisis.”

Trust government

Law supporters believe that it is strictly defined in its scope. The legislation stipulates that if all other efforts to persuade individuals fail, restricting the order will be used as the final means.

Individuals have the right to appeal to restrictions. The initial continued 30 days can be extended five times.

Tan Ern Ser Ser Ser Ser Ser Ser Ser Ser Ser Ser Se, Associate Professor of Singapore University (NUS) Sociology Professor, said that although the law may be affected by outsiders, the Singaporeans generally expect that the government is supervising the public’s welfare and well -being of the public. As a result, play a positive role.

Tan said to the Peninsula TV station: “In a sense, Singaporeans want ‘support of their parents’, not the” control “of parentalism.”

Tan said that Singapore is different from the public’s high trust in the government and quoted investigations such as Asian barometers and world value surveys.

Tan pointed out that the Singaporeans have been widely accepted by home orders, compulsory masks wearing masks, and contact tracking during the 19 great periods.

YIP HON Weng is a member of the Parliament of the People’s Action Party. He said that the expansion of police power is a necessary response to the increasing scam issue.

YIP told Al Jazeera that “the ability to quickly take action is the changes in the game rules of the victims.” As a liar as a government official.

“Temporarily restricting account access is a fierce step, but it can be removed from financial destruction. However, such measures must be taken cautiously to avoid destroying public trust.”

YIP said that the law’s “violations-temporarily restricted access to account-to achieve subtle balance between protecting personal agency and strong implementation.”

Singapore
Caroline Chia/Reuters on January 27, 2023

Some analysts say that although the law is suitable for Singapore’s political background, such measures may not be easily adopted in the global background.

SMU’s tan said: “All countries must determine what is useful to them and whether the legislative system has the support of purchasing scams.” The political costs of this measure cannot be ignored. “

SUSS said that the law has attracted negative online Chat, losing government political capital, and added that it “has created a topic that can be used for them in the upcoming election.”

Singapore’s general election is planned to be held in November.

NUS’s tan indicates that in the era when politicians and governments are increasingly confident, anti -scanning law is unlikely to establish a global precedent.

“In short, my opinion is that when design intervention measures are limited or good, and legal careers need to trust the government/institutions, social cohesion and consensus, but as society becomes more and more broken and polarized, Tan Tanfan becomes. Quoting Macbai’s words, in the era of entering the truth, “fairness, foul, fouls are fair.”



Source link

  • Related Posts

    Macron walks the rope with Trump

    Gary O’Donoghue Senior North American correspondent in Washington Watch: Trump and Macron quote “progress” in Ukraine’s war peace talks There is no doubt that the relationship between Europe and the…

    Russia – Ukrainian War: List of Key Events – Day 1,097 | Russia – Ukrainian War News

    This is a key development for the 1,097-day Russian invasion of Ukraine. This is what happened on Tuesday, February 25: struggle Politics and diplomacy Tatyana Moskalkova, Russian Human Rights Director…

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *