A technician’s post has sparked a heated debate about entry-level salaries in India’s IT sector.

Abhishek Nair supported the idea that Rs 3.6 lakh per annum is not a bad deal for freshers without strong credentials or relevant skills.

“Might be in trouble but it must be said: 3.6 LPA is not bad if you are from a 500 level college and have no programming skills. Don’t expect a 1Cr package without a solid project portfolio. Don’t expect too much if the most highlighted on your resume is your bachelor’s degree,” he wrote, prompting a firestorm of reactions.

Some users supported Nair’s argument, noting that a lack of practical skills often holds graduates back.

One user wrote: “Recently I interviewed an IIT graduate. Although he knew advanced concepts like Fibonacci Heap, he did not apply them effectively. The real problem is that many students lack application skills, regardless of their university level

Others pushed back, claiming that Nair’s post ignored broader systemic issues. “Inflation exists! A newcomer’s salary in 2004 cannot be the same as in 2024. Offering 3.6 LPA today is exploitative,” said a frustrated commenter.

Some commentators rejected the assumption that graduates of top institutions are inherently more deserving. One noted, “What I don’t agree with is the idea that a tier 1 college student deserves a 1 crore package and is inherently a genius. Success is about skills, not rankings.”

Responding to the criticism, Nair clarified his position. He emphasized that his comments were aimed at first-year students with minimal skills or outstanding achievements, not all graduates.

“I am not asking anyone to settle for less. If you feel undervalued, it’s probably time to look for a better role or organization,” he explained.